Data from: Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species

Kuebbing SE, Maynard DS, Bradford MA

Date Published: July 14, 2017

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cb2f5

 

Files in this package

Content in the Dryad Digital Repository is offered "as is." By downloading files, you agree to the Dryad Terms of Service. To the extent possible under law, the authors have waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this data. CC0 (opens a new window) Open Data (opens a new window)

Title Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology, Functional Diversity and Invasion Impacts
Downloaded 8 times
Description A full description of this data set can be found in Kuebbing, SE, DS Maynard, and MA Bradford (2017) Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species. Journal of Ecology. DATA SET 1: Brief Methods (for full methods see Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology). We used laboratory microcosm experiments to assess litter decomposition dynamics of litter mixtures. Each microcosm consisted of 1 g of 2 mm-milled leaf litter and 0.25 g of mineral soil in 50-mL centrifuge tubes. Each microcosm contained in equal proportion litter from each of the three dominant canopy trees (Carya cordiformis, Quercus alba, and Q. rubra), in addition to one of the 18 understory plants. The latter were added at three relative abundances (1%, 5%, and 25%). There were 216 microcosms (18 understory plants × 3 proportions [1%, 5%, and 25%] × 4 replicates) and 4 tree-canopy litter control replicates, bringing the total number of microcosms to 220. DATA SET 2: Brief Methods (for full methods see Kuebbing et al. 2017, Journal of Ecology). To assess green leaf traits, we collected 5 green leaves from a minimum of 5 individuals per species in summer 2014. For canopy trees, we “sling-shot sampled” canopy branches to collect full-sun leaves. For understory species, we randomly sampled leaves from individuals. We selected leaves that appeared free of herbivory as well as fungal or bacterial infection. We scanned fully-hydrated leaves on a flatbed scanner within 24 h of collection and then dried them at 60°C for 72 h before measuring mass. To estimate specific leaf area, we measured scanned leaf surface area with digital software (ImageJ v.1.51f) and divided area by dry mass. To assess the green leaf chemical traits, we ball milled the material (Spex CertiPrep 8000-D Mixer Mill, Metuchen, New Jersey, USA) and determined C and N concentrations using Micro-Dumas combustion analysis. To assess leaf litter traits, we collected litter in fall 2014 from senescing plants. We collected freshly-fallen leaves from the ground or shook senesced leaves free from branches. Litter was air-dried and leaves were selected that had no evidence of fungal colonization or herbivory. We milled all litter to pass a 2-mm mesh (Wiley® Cutting Mill, Model 2, Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, New Jersey, USA), creating a consistent size class across species (Strickland et al. 2009; Keiser et al. 2011; 2013). We used the same method as for green leaves to determine litter total N and C. To assess litter P we used acid digestion and colorimetric analysis of milled litter. To measure lignin we used the ANKOM acid detergent lignin method (ANKOM Technology, Macedon NY; protocol at www.ankom.com). We report total C, N and P on a percent mass basis and acid detergent lignin (ADL) on a per gram dry mass basis.
Download Kuebbing, Sara_Data for Dryad.xlsx (77.94 Kb)
Details View File Details

When using this data, please cite the original publication:

Kuebbing SE, Maynard DS, Bradford MA (2017) Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species. Journal of Ecology, online in advance of print. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12835

Additionally, please cite the Dryad data package:

Kuebbing SE, Maynard DS, Bradford MA (2017) Data from: Linking functional diversity and ecosystem processes: a framework for using functional diversity metrics to predict the ecosystem impact of functionally unique species. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.cb2f5
Cite | Share
Download the data package citation in the following formats:
   RIS (compatible with EndNote, Reference Manager, ProCite, RefWorks)
   BibTex (compatible with BibDesk, LaTeX)

Search for data

Be part of Dryad

We encourage organizations to: